Why the answer is no
SOC 2 is an attestation against the AICPA Trust Services Criteria. The criteria are written as objectives a control must achieve. They ask whether vulnerabilities in your system are identified, evaluated and acted upon. They do not prescribe how.
Because the criteria state objectives, your auditor decides what evidence satisfies them. That is the mechanism. There is no rule to look up; there is an auditor to ask.
Why your auditor asks anyway
An independent, dated report from a third party with no stake in the outcome is the fastest evidence an auditor can accept for vulnerability identification. The alternative is reading your internal programme's records.
That alternative is legitimate. It is also more work to evidence: scan schedules, triage decisions, remediation tickets with dates, proof the loop closed. If you run that programme well, say so and show it. If you do not, the test is cheaper than building it before the window closes.
Ask these before you buy
One email to your auditor prevents the two expensive mistakes: buying the wrong engagement, and buying it at the wrong time.
- Which criteria do you expect this report to support?
- Will a vulnerability assessment satisfy them, or do you want exploitation evidence?
- What has to be in scope: the product only, or internal systems too?
- When does the Type 2 observation window open and close?
Timing is the part people get wrong
For a Type 2, evidence has to sit inside the observation period. A test performed before the window opened may not count toward it.
And a report delivered the week of the audit documents open findings with no time left to close them. Test early enough that the retest also lands inside the window.

